Last Updated on September 21, 2024 by Kittredge Cherry
John the Evangelist and Apostle is commonly considered to be Jesus’ “Beloved Disciple” — and possibly his lover. His feast day is Dec. 27 in Catholic and Protestant churches. He has two feast days, May 8 and Sept. 26, in the Orthodox tradition.
[Update on Sept. 2, 2024: This article is a major rewrite with lots of new info and ideas, plus a new artwork. Queer Mexican artist Medusczka Gorgona expands on the gospel story by showing a kiss between John with a rainbow halo and Jesus with a crown of thorns in the art pictured above.]
Shrouded in both mystery and reverence, t unnamed Beloved Disciple is popular with LGBTQ Christians because he had a close, loving relationship directly with Jesus. A centuries-old tradition links them as a same-sex couple. The love between Jesus and John has been celebrated at least since medieval times. For example, medieval English abbot Aelred of Rievaulx commended their “heavenly marriage” as an example to guide others. And the idea that they were lovers has been inspiring queer people and causing controversy for centuries. The possibility of John as genderfluid or genderqueer is also being explored because John is often portrayed as younger and beardless, which is more “feminine” by traditional standards. LGBTQ interpretations of the Beloved Disciple can open up space for dialogue about the nature of love and faith.
This article follows the traditional and still most common view by identifying the Beloved Disciple as John, but there is a wide range of alternate theories. Other identities proposed for the Beloved Disciple include Lazarus, Mary Magdalene, Thomas and even Judas, the disciple who betrayed Jesus. Because the Beloved Disciple is left unnamed, each believer is free to imagine or become the Beloved Disciple in their own way.
Whoever he or she was, the Beloved Disciple reclined close to Jesus at the Last Supper, resting their head on Jesus’ chest near his heart. From the cross, Jesus entrusted the Beloved Disciple and his mother, Mary, into each other’s care as parent and child. Some see this as Jesus affirming same-sex marriage because in effect he established John as Mary’s son-in-law. No other male disciples were present at the crucifixion. In John’s gospel, the Beloved Disciple was the first to reach the empty tomb of Jesus, the first to believe in his resurrection and the first to recognize the risen Christ at the miraculous catch of fish.
John is believed to be the youngest of the 12 apostles — about five years younger than Jesus — and is the presumed author of the gospel of John, the Book of Revelation and the three Epistles of John. He participated in many of the main events in Christ’s ministry and helped build the church in Jerusalem after Jesus died. The gospel of John is the most mystical of the four gospels, filled with themes of love, light and life.
About the Beloved Disciple
The unnamed “disciple whom Jesus loved” is referenced five times in John’s gospel: In John 13:23 (Last Supper), John 19:26 (crucifixion), John 20:2 (empty tomb), John 21:7 (miraculous catch of fish), John 21:20 (future predicted), and John 21:24 (authorship). None of the other three gospels even mention the Beloved Disciple.
John is never mentioned in the gospel that bears his name, but at the end of the final chapter, the writer claims to be the Beloved Disciple. Early church tradition ascribes authorship directly to John. None of the other gospels include the Beloved Disciple in parallel scenes.
Some imagine John as a self-serving braggart for calling to himself “the disciple whom Jesus loved.” Other interpreters say that he avoided using his own name as a modest way to put the focus on Jesus and prevent self-promotion.
While the earliest translations emphasize the closeness between Jesus and the Beloved Disciple, many modern translations have put more distance between them. The “the disciple whom Jesus loved” was “leaning on Jesus’ bosom” in the17th-century King James Version, but newer translations simply say that he is “reclining next” to Jesus.
About John
Even apart from his intimacy with Jesus, John is an inspiring spiritual role model because of his theological depth and leadership in early church. The gospels are contradictory, with many interpretations and legends and scant historical evidence, but a picture of the historical John does emerge.
John’s parents were Zebedee, a fisherman, and Salome, who also became an important follower of Jesus. Salome was among the group of women who supported Jesus financially, attended his crucifixion and discovered his empty tomb. Some medieval traditions identify her as the Mary’s own biological sister, which would mean that John was Jesus’ cousin.
John and his older brother James are sometimes called the “sons of Zebedee” in the gospels. Together with Peter, the three men formed the inner core of Jesus’ disciples. The trio witnessed the raising of Jairus’ daughter, the transfiguration, and Jesus’ agony in Gethsemane. Later Paul describes these three as “pillars” of the early church who welcomed him with “the right hand of fellowship” (Galatians 2:9).
According to tradition, John was one of the first two disciples called to join Jesus. In John’s gospel, Jesus begins his ministry by inviting two followers of the Baptist to spend the day with him: Andrew and an unnamed man who is presumed to be John. The gospel first mentions John by name when Jesus finds him and his brother mending their fishing nets on the Sea of Galilee. Jesus invites them to follow him, and they do so immediately, leaving their father behind in the fishing boat.
The Bible notes the brothers’ close relationship with Jesus on multiple occasions. Jesus nicknames them “Sons of Thunder” (Boanerges in Aramaic), probably due to their zealous faith or bold personalities. Their passionate reactions cause Jesus to calm them down on several occasions. He rebukes them for wanting to call down heavenly fire to punish a Samaritan town that rejected him and for trying to stop an outsider from casting out demons in Jesus’ name.
After Jesus’ death, John and others overcome persecution as they build the early church as recorded in the Acts of the Apostles. The account ends with John still in Jerusalem. Early hagiographies fill in the blanks, reporting that John later moved to the Turkish city of Ephesus, one of the largest cities in the Mediterranean world at the time. And he did not necessarily travel alone. Some sources report that John moved there after Mary died, but others say that John was accompanied by Mary — and/or a new male partner named Prochorus.
Yes, the bereaved Beloved Disciple may have found new love with a younger man. Prochorus was one of the first seven deacons appointed to distribute food to widows in Acts 6:5. Hagiographies describe Prochorus as John’s “companion.” John probably knew Prochorus for a long time because, according to a later tradition, he was among the 70 disciples sent to preach the good news in Luke 10. Prochorus became bishop of the city of Nicomedia in what is now Turkey. His adventures with John are recounted in the apocryphal Acts of John, which is attributed to Prochorus.
Ephesus had a long history of worshipping the divine feminine, including and one of the first churches dedicated to Mary and a temple to Mary’s forerunner, the goddess Artemis. Some hagiographies say that John led Christian converts to destroy Artemis’ temple, but this could not be true because it stood for centuries after his death.
As part of anti-Christian persecution by Roman emperor Domitian, John and Prochorus were banished together to island of Patmos. The small Greek island was a rocky and desolate place about 65 miles from Ephesus on the Aegean Sea. In this barren spot, John received mind-boggling visions packed with powerful, esoteric symbols such as the four horsemen of the Apocalypse, the Beast, the Lamb, the Bride, and the Woman Clothed with the Sun. Prochorus served as John’s scribe, and they worked as a team to write the book of Revelation during and after their exile. It begins by stating that it was written by John on Patmos (Revelation 1:9). Scholars say that he may or may not be the same John, but according to church tradition, it was John the Apostle wrote Revelation, the Bible’s final and most apocalyptic book. In his role as author of Revelation, he is known as John the Theologian or John the Divine.
John died peacefully of natural causes as an old man in Ephesus around 100 AD. Later Prochorus was killed for his faith as a martyr.
John’s gospel often proclaims that death is not the end. This vital message is conveyed in the world’s most popular Bible verse, which was spoken by Jesus and transcribed by his Beloved Disciple: “For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:16). Many LGBTQ Christians have found a lifeline in the radical inclusivity of the promise to “whoever” believes, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.
About John’s gospel
The gospel of John is queer in many ways, not just because it is the only gospel to mention the Beloved Disciple. Its style and stories are significantly different from the synoptic gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Scholars estimate that the gospel of John was written later than the others, perhaps 15 to 30 years after the synoptic gospels and 70 years after the death of Jesus. It was probably written in John’s name a community of his followers, a common historical practice.
John’s gospel stands alone in presenting several other narratives with special meaning for the LGBTQ community. Lazarus of Bethany is absent from the other gospels, but John provides an extensive chronicle of their relationship, culminating when Jesus raises him from the dead. Lazarus and his “sisters” Mary and Martha may have been Christ’s queer chosen family. His gospel is also noted for its gender inclusivity because it portrays the importance of women such as Mary and Martha, Mary Magdalene and the Samaritan woman at the well.
Only John tells about the wedding at Cana (possibly a same-sex wedding) and the washing of the disciples’ feet, with its man-to-man sensuality. And John’s gospel is suffused with love. For John, the bond with Jesus was as close as a vine and a branch. No one else reports Jesus’ love commandment, but John repeats it three times, in John 13:34, 15:12, and 15:17: “Love each other as I have loved you.”
John’s writings helped lay the foundation for the Christian tradition of “mystical marriage” or “bridal mysticism,” a form of devotion where love unites the believer and Christ like a married couple, including erotic rapture. While all four gospels use the metaphor of Christ the bridegroom, the concept is expressed more fully and frequently in the writings attributed to John. The theme is woven throughout John’s gospel. As Revelation 21:2 says, “I, John, saw the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.” With Christ as a bridegroom, the church or an individual member becomes his bride, regardless of gender.
Medieval mystics are particularly known for fleshing out their visions of mystical marriage with Jesus. The union became a same-sex marriage for devout men honored by the church for their holiness, such as Bernard of Clairvaux, John of the Cross, John of La Verna and Bernardo de Hoyos. John’s writings had a profound impact on how these male brides of Christ wrote about their intimate, loving bonds with Jesus.
Did Jesus and John share an erotic relationship?
It’s impossible to know if the historical Jesus and John were lovers, but it’s worthwhile to consider as a metaphor for how a believer, queer or otherwise, can experience love with the Christ of faith.
A medieval European tradition asserts that John and Jesus were the bridal couple at the Cana wedding feast. Jesus performed his first miracle at Cana by turning water into wine. The wedding at Cana is unique to the gospel of John. It occurs shortly after the call of John without ever naming who is getting married (John 2:1-11). But the apocryphal Acts of John states that John broke off his engagement to a woman to “bind himself” to Jesus. The idea that Jesus wed John at Cana is discussed by Gerard Loughlin in the introduction to “Queer Theology: Rethinking the Western Body.”
One of the earliest images of John and Jesus together is a little-known 12th-century miniature, “The Calling of St. John.” It depicts two scenes: Christ coaxing the disciple John to leave his female bride and follow him, and John resting his head on Jesus’ chest. Jesus cups the chin of his beloved, an artistic convention used to indicate romantic intimacy. The Latin text means, “Get up, leave the breast of your bride, and rest on the breast of the Lord Jesus.”
This scenario is also illustrated in the 1865 drawing “The Bride, Bridegroom and Sad Love” by Solomon Simeon, a Jewish British painter whose art career was cut short when he was arrested for homosexual acts. It can be viewed at this link (warning: nudity). It portrays a melancholy trio where a Christ figure or male angel holds hands with a groom kissing a bride. Subtle and not-so-subtle homoerotic themes underlie much of Simeon’s artwork. Oscar Wilde, another 19th-century Briton whose creative career was ruined by an arrest for homosexuality, lamented when he was forced to sell his collection of Simeon art.
An entire chapter is dedicated to John as the bride of Christ in the 2013 book “Saintly Brides and Bridegrooms: The Mystic Marriage in Renaissance Art” by Carolyn D. Muir, art professor at the University of Hong Kong.
Some historical sources took a positive view of the intense male bond between Jesus and the Beloved Disciple. King James I, who commissioned the famed King James Version of the Bible, used it to justify his rumored gay relationship with the Earl of Buckingham. “Christ had his John, and I have my George,” he said in a 1617 speech. The 12th-century abbot Aelred of Rievaulx, who is considered a patron saint of LGBTQ people, recommended the love between Jesus and John as a model for monks to follow. His treatise “On Spiritual Friendship,” includes these lines:
“Some are joined to us more intimately and passionately than others in the lovely bond of spiritual friendship. And lest this sort of sacred love should seem improper to anyone, Jesus himself, in everything like us, patient and compassionate with us in every matter, transfigured it through the expression of his own love: for he allowed only one, not all, to recline on his breast as a sign of his special love, so that the virgin head was supported in the flowers of the virgin breast, and the closer they were, the more copiously did the fragrant secrets of the heavenly marriage impart the sweet smell of spiritual chrism to their virgin love. Although all the disciples were blessed with the sweetness of the great love of the most holy master, nonetheless he conceded as a privilege to one alone this symbol of a more intimate love, that he should be called the ‘disciple whom Jesus loved.’”
[As quoted by John Boswell in “Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality: Gay People in Western Europe from the Beginning of the Christian Era to the Fourteenth Century,” p. 225-226]
When acceptance of same-sex love waned after the 12th century, Aelred’s work was locked up in Cistercian monasteries, never to appear again outside monastic circles until their rediscovery in the more tolerant times of the 1970s.
[Marlowe paragraph] The idea that Jesus and his Beloved Disciple had a sexual relationship was publicly discussed as early at the 16th century, when English playwright Christopher Marlowe was tried for blasphemy on the charge of claiming that “St. John the Evangelist was bedfellow to Christ and leaned always in his bosom, that he used him as the sinners of Sodoma.” In 1550 Francesco Calcagno, a citizen of Venice, was investigated by the Inquisition for making the heretical claim that “St. John was Christ’s catamite,” which means a boy or young man in a pederastic sexual relationship with an older man.
Frederick the Great, king of Prussia, expressed the same idea in his comedic poem La Palladion, published in a very limited edition in 1749-50: “This good Jesus, how do you think/He got John to sleep in his bed?/Can’t you see he was his Ganymede?” The handsome young Greek hero Ganymede is a symbol of homoerotic desire because Zeus fell in love with him. His Latine name was Catamitus, the basis for the English word catamite.
Many modern scholars have expressed belief that Jesus and his Beloved Disciple shared a an erotic physical relationship. They include Hugh Montefiore, Robert Williams, Sjef van Tilborg, John McNeill, Rollan McCleary, Robert E. Shore-Goss and James Neill. A thorough analysis is included in “The Man Jesus Loved: Homoerotic Narratives from the New Testament” by the late Theodore Jennings, who served as Biblical theology professor at Chicago Theological Seminary. He finds the evidence “inconclusive” as to whether the beloved disciple was John, but it leaves no doubt that Jesus had a male lover.
“A close reading of the texts in which the beloved disciple appears supports the hypothesis that the relationship between him and Jesus may be understood as that of lovers. As it happens, both Jesus and the beloved are male, meaning that their relationship may be said to be, in modern terms, a ‘homosexual’ relationship,” Jennings writes (p. 34).
Religion professor Tat-siong Benny Liew sparked controversy by suggesting that Jesus was a genderfluid drag king with queer desires. Conservatives attacked his chapter “Queering Closets and Perverting Desires: Cross-Examining John’s Engendering and Transgendering Word across Different Worlds” in the 2009 book “They Were All Together in One Place? Toward Minority Biblical Criticism.”
The homoeroticism of the relationship is also explored in the chapter on the Beloved Disciple in
“The Double: Male Eros, Friendships, and Mentoring–from Gilgamesh to Kerouac” by Edward Sellner.
The queer history of their relationship is presented in the video “Before Stonewall, Episode 5: The Myth of the Beloved Disciple” by historian Chad Denton.
Jesus embraces the Beloved Disciple in historical art
A newly discovered painting of Jesus and his Beloved Disciple was displayed to the public in 2019 for the first time in 450 years. They appear in the Last Supper by Italian nun Plautilla Nelli.
It is the world’s first known depiction of the Last Supper by a woman. Nelli was a Dominican nun and the first woman painter of Renaissance Florence. Her life-size Last Supper is about 23 feet long, almost as big as Da Vinci’s famous version. The Dominican nun was a self-taught artist with many patrons, including women.
A 15th-century Ethiopian diptych showing a kiss between Christ and his beloved was on display at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York as part of the “Africa & Byzantium” exhibit through March 3, 2024. Then it moved to the Cleveland Museum of Art in Ohio from April 14 to July 21, 2024.
Museum materials give it alternate titles as either “Diptych with the Kiss of Christ to His Beloved” or “Diptych with the Kiss of St. John.” The hinged wooden panels include a painting of their kiss next to an inscription that reads, “Picture of Our Lord, how he kissed his beloved John.” On Jesus’ lap is a book open to the first words of John’s gospel “In the beginning was the Word…”
Now-iconic images of the loving embrace between John and Christ apparently originated during the early 1300s in German convents in the Rhineland and Swabia. These were devotional images intended to help viewers deepen their connection to Christ. Prolific artists created many versions. Today one of them is housed in the Cleveland Museum of Art in Ohio.
The subject is known as “Christus Johannes Gruppe” (Christ John Group) or Johannesminne (love of John), with minne being a Middle High German word for erotic-emotional love. Many of these images were actually created for women, not men, to contemplate. Most if not all of the Johannesminne statues were altarpieces for Dominican convents and nunneries.
For example, “Christus Johannes Gruppe” (Christ John Group) by the unknown Master of Oberschwaben spent many centuries in an Augustinian convent in Inzigkofen, a town in the region of Sigmaringen in southwestern Germany. A museum in Berlin acquired in it the early 20th century, and it is now housed in the Bode Museum of the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation.
The history, eroticism, appeal and impact of these devotional images is explored in “The Late Medieval Andachtsbild,” an unpublished essay by Daniel G. Conklin, a retired Anglican priest in Berlin. He writes,
“One common characteristic of the Johannesminne is that the figure of John seems a bit gender-ambiguous, i.e. it looks like he might be a “she.” Considering the place where these images arose and were beheld, it takes no great stretch of the imagination to envision the effect of the Johannesminne on a cloistered young woman who was well versed in the Cistercian “bridal” mysticism of St. Bernard of Clairvaux…. The Johannesminne is an image of profound tenderness embued with a kind of gentle eroticism. As an altarpiece it must have been a constant reminder of the connection between the Lord’s Last Supper and the celebration of the Mass and it surely reinforced the pious conviction that in the Eucharistic bread and wine the risen Christ “dwells in us and we in him” in a profound and intimate way.”
Conklin goes on to identify homoeroticism as one source of the image’s enduring power:
“The popularity of the Johannesminne – then and now – may also stem from the fact that this is an image involving love and tenderness between two adult males. The fact that this Andachtsbild arose in monasteries, communities of same-sex individuals, probably comes as no surprise. Its power to awaken faith and delight in close communion with Christ is perhaps not its only appeal. The Johannesminne has become perhaps even more appealing in our day in which people of the same gender in committed relationships seek some form(s) of faith confirmation of who they are and whose they are. The Johannesminne may very well serve as a mirror as well as a model for many, not only same-sex oriented persons.”
In Germany the Johannesminne image remains so important that it has even been made into a postage stamp. Its influence may also live on in today’s popular “Sacred Heart of Jesus” icons, which show the physical heart of Jesus in his chest. Conklin explains:
The Johannesminne as an altarpiece not only visualized the intimate communion of the Eucharist, but also seems to have been one of the essential sources for the unfolding of the “Sacred Heart of Jesus” mysticism which developed later, but had its beginnings in this Andachtsbild. The beholder could imagine John, i.e. the beholder him/herself, hearing the heartbeat of Jesus while leaning on his chest. The communion is that “close.”
Another early sculpture in this style is “St. John Resting on Jesus’ Chest,” circa 1320, which is housed at the Museum Mayer van den Bergh in Antwerp. It can be seen online at the Web Gallery of Art. The sculpture was created by Master Heinrich of Constance for the the Dominican convent of St. Catherine’s valley in Switzerland. Wikimedia Commons displays a set of 15 statues of Johannesminne in Germany at this link.
Antique French religious medals feature some rare and beautiful images of Jesus and his Beloved Disciple. It is unusual to find a medallion with an image of Christ other than the crucifixion.
Contemporary icons show the Beloved Disciple
Artists continue to make new icons of Jesus and John in traditional style. One of the newest is a contemporary Byzantine icon available at the Angelicon Etsy shop. It was painted in egg tempera by the mother-daughter team of Eka and Ari in their small workshop in Crete, Greece.
John the Beloved Disciple in contemporary art
Over the centuries many artworks have illustrated the deep love between Jesus and his Beloved Disciple. A variety of contemporary artists have als odone new interpretations of John and Jesus together. Many of the historic images appear to show John as much younger than Jesus, but their age difference is de-emphasized and they both look like grown men in most of the newer images. Perhaps the reason for the change is growing awareness of the church’s complicity with pedophile priests, combined with the with the need for modern gay couples for find religious affirmation.
The men’s halos appear to be linked rings in “Bridegroom and the Beloved” by Matthew, a practicing Roman Catholic who shares his artwork at Queer Catholic Icons on Instagram as @queer.catholic.icons. He adapts the traditional iconography by making both figures look youthful, so there is little or no age gap between the Bridegroom and the Beloved.
One of the newer images is “Beloved Disciple” by James Day. He studied liturgical art and queer theology at Episcopal Divinity School in Cambridge, Massachusetts, earning a Master of Arts degree in theology before returning home to central Maine. When not caring for care for his aging mother and disabled partner, he puts his hands to a variety of visual and fiber arts, primarily focused on queer spirituality.” Day’s painting of the “Beloved Disciple” hung in the EDS Chapel in fall 2016.
The wedding between Jesus and his beloved disciple is one of the LGBT Christian themes explored in monumental nude paintings by gay New Zealand artist Christopher Olwage. He gives a sacred gay interpretation to the wedding feast at Cana. Olwage is an LGBTQ activist and gender-bending ballet dancer who reigned as Mr. Gay World in 2013.
“Crucifixion” by Christopher Olwage |
Another recent work is the 2012 icon “Jesus and the Beloved Disciple” by Laurie Gudim. Based in Colorado, Gudim is an artist, Jungian psychotherapist and progressive Episcopalian. Her work uses a motif dating back at least to the 13th century.The long artistic tradition depicts John as the Beloved Disciple resting his head on the breast of Jesus.
This sculpture spent many centuries in an Augustinian convent in Inzigkofen, a town in the region of Sigmaringen in southwestern Germany. A museum in Berlin acquired in it the early 20th century, and it is now housed in the Bode Museum of the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation.
Beloved Disciple in poetry and music
Various poets have written about the love between Jesus and John from a gay or queer viewpoint. A gay man prays, wondering if Jesus felt sexual attraction to John, in a poem by longtime LGBTQ church activist and poet Louie Clay (né Louie Crew).
What did you feel when your beloved John
lay across your lap casually?
He wrote these lines raising the possibility of a queer Christ in his 1980 poem “Lutibelle Prays: William Werc’s Prayer.” In 1974 Clay founded Integrity USA, the national Episcopal LGBTQ organization. The whole poem is posted at this link.
Another poem that addresses the homoerotic love between Jesus and John as is “The Third Dance of Christmas: A Fiddle Dance for St. John’s Day” by a poet who wants to be known only as Joe. It begins:
Sweet John was a danceron the shore of old Capernauma lovely boy not fit for fishingor carpentry, or marrying.They tell he left his empty boatfor the sake of the bold young fellowwho looked at him that April mornand said, my love, come follow.
The interplay of humanity, divinity and the “honeyed warmth of love, of starlight” between Jesus and John is explored in the poem “A Portrait of John at the Last Supper” by trans gay poet Keaton St. James. The full poem is available at this link.
Queer poet Jim Wise references John in “Seminarians,” an unpublished poem from his “Queer Psalter” collection:
After a long day of
watching him preach
his gospel, which was
nothing more than
begging people to
actually give a damn
about one another,
we wanted to be his
Beloved John, his Lazarus,
his place to lay his head.
For more poetry by Wise, click here.
Contemporary America singer-songwriter Sufjan Stevens merges homoerotic desire and spiritual longing in the song “John My Beloved.” Many listeners hear references in the song to the love between Jesus and his disciple John as well as to modern gay sexual encounters. The song is available on a YouTube video and the album from his album “Carrie and Lowell.”
Beloved Disciple in religious fiction
LGBTQ interpretations of the Beloved Disciple in religious fiction include:
BESTSELLER AT Q SPIRIT
“Dayspring” by Anthony Oliveira.
Christ’s beloved disciple comes alive in a queer literary retelling from a major publisher. The Beloved Disciple never reveals his name, but his story has elements of both Lazarus and John the Evangelist. The first page says, “And the word became flesh: coarse hair. crooked smile. the taste of salt on his clavicle. i am the disciple whom he loved.” Billed as a debut novel, “Dayspring” blends prose, poetry and memoir, switching between 21st-century Canada and first-century Nazareth. Jesus’ words as imagined by the author are printed in red like a red-letter Bible. Both sacred and profane, the book is loaded with literary references. The GLAAD award-winning author grew up queer in a Portuguese Catholic family in Canada and earned a PhD in English literature from the University of Toronto. Published by Strange Light, an imprint of Penguin Random House, 2024.
“The Gay Disciple: Jesus’ Friend Tells It His Own Way” by John Henson. Starting with the gay Beloved Disciple, various Bible characters tell their experiences with Jesus in their own words. The author believes that the Beloved Disciple was Lazarus. “Maybe for my lifetime, maybe for many hundreds or even thousands of years, my story would be taboo, until that day came when Christians would no longer be afraid of love,” he writes. The author is a retired Baptist minister who graduated in history and theology from Southampton and Oxford Universities in the United Kingdom. Brenner is a San Francisco author who served as a parish pastor for 10 years and in the hospice field for 25 years. Published in 2006 by John Hunt Publishing.
“Abominations: A Novel” by Paul R. Brenner. “Abominations: A Novel” by Paul R. Brenner. A man describes his struggles in the years after the death of his lover, a radical young rabbi named Jesus. As leader of a sacred community in Jerusalem, the Beloved Disciple faces danger when fanatics try to cleanse Judaea of all impurities and foreign influences, including Greek love. Mary Magdalene and Last Supper host Joanna are also caught in the conflict. The He flees to become a visiting scholar at the Temple of the Muses and great library in Alexandria, but his life continues to be disrupted by ethnic conflict and fascinating relationships with people such as Markos, the sexy, wealthy young Greek who pursues him. The narrator never reveals his name, but this Beloved Disciple comes from a wealthy, Hellenized family. Published in 2008 by Xlibris.
Beloved Disciple excerpt from Jesus in Love: A Novel
I became distracted by the not unwelcome presence of somebody standing close behind me, closer than necessary in the loosely packed crowd. I sensed that it was John, and spun around to see him planted there like a tall cedar tree. He leaned against me, eyes flashing. “I can’t wait for the Messiah to come. I’ve seen him in visions.”
“Really? Tell me what you remember.” It was exciting to find someone who was aware of God’s efforts to communicate.
“The Messiah is like a gentle lamb who sits on a throne with a rainbow around it. And yet his eyes flame with fire, and a sharp sword comes out of his mouth to strike down evildoers.”
“The truth is large,” I said.
“Are you saying my vision isn’t true?” he challenged.
“No, I’m not saying that. I expect that you will see more.”
When John smiled, his faced crinkled into a fascinating landscape of wrinkles. His eyes felt black and mysterious like the midnight sky as they roamed over me. “Do you want a prayer partner tonight?” he asked.
If anyone else had asked, I would have said no, but I looked again at John’s handsome, bejeweled soul and his long, sinewy body.
“Sure,” I agreed impulsively.
Only then did I notice that the Baptist had finished preaching. John steered me toward the caves where the Baptist and his inner circle of disciples lived. Lower-ranking disciples were ready with water vessels and towels to assist everyone with ritual purification before we ate a spartan meal of locusts and wild honey. One of them approached me.
“Wash up, and we’ll get together after supper,” John said as we parted.
Beloved Disciple prayers
Q Spirit’s Litany of Queer Saints includes these lines:
Saint John, Beloved Disciple who reclined next to Jesus at the Last Supper and wrote a gospel full of love and light, pray for us.
Links related to the Beloved Disciple
Cuddling with Jesus by Chris Glaser
___
To read this article in Spanish, go to:
San Juan el Evangelista: Discípulo Amado de Jesús (Santos Queer)
___
Top image credit:
“John and Jesus” (Juan y Jesús) by Medusczka Gorgona
___
This post is part of the LGBTQ Saints series by Kittredge Cherry. Traditional and alternative saints, people in the Bible, LGBTQ martyrs, authors, theologians, religious leaders, artists, deities and other figures of special interest to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender and queer (LGBTQ) people and our allies are covered.
This article has evolved and expanded greatly since the first version was posted in December 2009. It was published on Q Spirit on Q Spirit in December 2016, was expanded with new material over time, underwent a major update in September 2024, and was most recently updated on Sept. 21, 2024.
Copyright © Kittredge Cherry. All rights reserved.
Qspirit.net presents the Jesus in Love Blog on LGBTQ spirituality.
To suggest that the Apostle John and Jesus were lovers is ludicrous. There is not one shred of evidence here other than to try to twist Scripture into saying that the “agape” love shared between these two was somehow “eros” which the original languages DO NOT SAY.
This is as big a stretch as trying to say David and Jonathan from the Old Testament were lovers when the Hebrew language used says nothing about that relationship.
Jesus was without sin hence he would have never done something that is defined as a sin by god in the old testamony. Our modern society of the west is extremely sexualized, which becomes very visible once one starts traveling into other cultures. Kisses on the cheeks are already considered “gay” by many people in the west, but are performed by many in other nations. It is barely imaginable, how different it was 2000 years ago. The simplest explanation for John and Jesus, is that the writer was simply so innocent and so far from gay thoughts, that he did not think about it a second. Also there are multiple old greek words for love and only one of them is describing the romantic love, which was not used in this context.
He will smile sweetly at the admiring lover; he will show appreciation for the other’s friendship, advice, and assistance. He will allow the lover to greet him by touching, affectionately, his genitals and his face, while he looks, himself, demurely at the ground. … To touch the face of the beloved younger man as he looks demurely down is a hallmark of homosexual love and courtship in the ancient Greek world. The older man will touch the younger’s chin and gently raise the chin until their eyes meet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pederasty_in_ancient_Greece
John the son of Zebedee was described as fair of face, very handsome with blue eyes and light hair: yes, Jesus’s lover was a beautiful, young hottie. No wonder Jesus likes to touch him and let him rest his head on Jesus’s chest as they reclined on their dining couch. Also, Jesus, many times, preached against adultery (violation of marriage vows) but never against homosexuality, which was very prevalent and accepted in their Greco-Roman world.
The only evidence for a homosexual relationship which you presented in this article were subjective opinions by various authors, without any stated evidence to back up any of those opinions (one was based on a “close reading” of Biblical passages, which is just a fancy way of describing putting a personal “spin” on well-known passages which do not give any explicit description of romance or sex). As for the idea that modern translations are increasingly moving away from describing the beloved disciple leaning against Jesus’ chest: that’s partly because modern scholars who know something about the historical context have increasingly pointed out that the original language is likely just describing the disciple tilting his head back to ask Jesus a question rather than resting his head on Jesus’ chest, since the people of the time often ate while reclining on separate couches arranged so that the head of any given person was right in front of the chest area of the next person to their right-hand side, hence to ask the question which this passage explicitly describes (i.e. it says the disciple was asking Jesus a question at the time), the disciple would need to tilt his head back toward the chest area of the person he was speaking to if that person was to his right and hence also slightly behind him. This changes the context quite a bit: no longer someone resting his head on Jesus’ chest but merely someone turning slightly and leaning back to ask a question. Paintings of the Last Supper always show the group seated on chairs at a table, which is unlikely to be historically accurate and also gives a likely misleading impression of what the language in this passage refers to.
This is incredibly wrong. John and Jesus were cousins by the flesh. They most likely had a brotherly type love. Please do not spread lies under the guise of “queer representation”. How tragically harmful. We should teach people to love one another no matter our sexual orientation (race, religion, gender expression, etc.) without twisting the truth to fit a narrative that isn’t true. Those artworks are very beautiful but I do not believe that is historical proof. They are simply historical caricatures from the point of view of the artists who made them. It’s not necessary to spread a lie about Jesus having been a gay man to prove the point that Jesus was/is an example of someone who would campaign for queer (or lgbtqan+) rights. If anything, I believe he would probably have been asexual, if you would really like to add on a label for “representation”. (I am also speaking on this matter as someone within both communities).
I have also not read any apocrypha, so I don’t know if there is more basis to your research based on that?
Either way, well wishes.
The cousin of Jesus was John the Baptist, not John the Evangelist. They are two different people. You raise a good point by saying, it’s not necessary for Jesus to have been a gay man to prove the point that Jesus was/is an example of someone who would campaign for queer (or lgbtqan+) rights.
Great questions! Many people had their hands in crafting the Bible over time, but the life energy of Jesus still speaks. Judge not, lest ye be judged, casting the first stone, etc. Take that to heart and the rest will be sorted out in time.
I have done extensive research on all aspects of the life of Jesus Christ, which culminated in my book “Barbelo – The Story of Jesus Christ”. As the book appears to be rather exhausting to read, I have made summaries of the key contributions on my website. Christ’s homosexuality is specifically addressed in the article “Was Jesus gay?” (https://www.riaanbooysen.com/was-jesus-gay).
@Riaan Booysen This has some atrocitous reasoning right from the beginning, considering that we have the Shroud of Turin, the fact that Jesus was insanely popular with women as they were following him all over, Mary Magdalene was in love with him, Mary the sister of Martha dried his feet with her hair and many of them were mourning at the crucifixion and visiting his tomb it shows clearly that he was a very attractive person, and if at any time males are attracted to males, they are almost always firstly feminine males which are more beautiful than regular males, although the earthly appearance of Jesus became obsolete after the resurrection in the glorified spiritual body.
I am not saying anything about his sexual preferences, because it is true that the apostle John was closer to him than Mary Magdalene and the others, although he most likely was not commited to this kind of romance since that was not part of his mission, but your “theory” seems like another one of these desperate internet attempts to attack the person of Jesus and Christianity in general.
Tilman Riemenschnider’s altarpiece of The Holy Blood at Rothenberg, Germany (1500-1505) is a prime, three-dimensional example of the (beloved) relationship between Jesus of Nazareth and the apostle John. John is resting his head on Jesus’ lap at The Last Supper while the other apostles are sitting upright exchanging thoughts with each other or listening to Jesus’ words. The apostle Judas, portrayed with the moneybag in hand, approaches Jesus and is the centerpiece to the altarpiece with Jesus off to the left [the figure of Judas is removed during certain holy days but it appears not to have been the intended aim of Riemenschneider).
I viewed the altarpiece in 2019 and would have included pictures to the text if I could have.
I would love to see your photos of Jesus and John on Gilman Riemenschnider’s altarpiece of The Holy Blood at Rothenberg! I hope to add one to the Q Spirit blog so everyone can see it. I will send you an email so you can submit them that way. You can also find my email address on the contact page: https://qspirit.net/contact/
Thanks for submitting your photo of Riemenschnider’s altarpiece. This is my first time trying to insert an image into a comment, so I hope that it works.
I also found the image and more info online at:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._James%27s_Church,_Rothenburg_ob_der_Tauber
Oscar Wilde, in his correspondence with Andre Gide published as part of “Out of the Depths,” his last publication before his death, jokes snidely that Judas’ reason for betraying Jesus was that he had been jilted by Jesus in favor of the much younger John.
From a Christian perspective, I have to ask this: How could Jesus and John be considered in a gay relationship if the Bible says that Jesus was a lamb of God without blemish? If God could destroy cities like Sodom and Gomorrah in a day then how could He be pleased with His Son if he was gay? And how could John write the Book of Revelations if he was gay when he wrote that unrepentant homosexuals would share a part in the second death? Jesus was prophesied since the Old Testament. If He was gay they would have said so. If Jesus and John were gay, how does that play a role in the salvation of everyone else? How does that fit into everything God didn’t want us to do? God does not contradict Himself. It says in the Bible if you couldn’t gently convince a sinner to see the error of their ways, to bring in 2 or 3 more witnesses to talk and confirm with them and if that didn’t work, to get the church involved and if the person was still unconvinced and continued to live with their sin, we Christians are told to treat them as a tax collector or a Gentile. It might seem after all that like we don’t want nothing more to do with the person when in fact, we still want them to feel accepted even though they have chosen to be apart! We are NOT supposed to give up on the sinner! God wouldn’t give up on us so we shouldn’t give up on each other. I have to ask again: Why would Jesus withstand all the whims of the devil only to come out gay? The Bible says how Jesus will spit out the lukewarm because it is neither cold or hot, which means in the spiritual arena, you have to choose a side. The Bible draws a very visible line and makes it clear that you are either with God or you are separated from Him. God IS love but His love is holy. There is nothing holy about homosexuality. It says it in the Bible. He won’t turn a sinner away if they come to Him with a broken spirit and a contrite heart. I say this with love as a fellow Christian. What I did just now by writing this is defending the faith (Ephesians 5:11). And what we need to do AS Christians is follow the advice of (2 Timothy 2:15). We must be careful if we want to teach the Word of God. We must be correct. And we must strive for the Truth. The Truth is not meant to make people feel bad. It’s meant to change lives and save souls. I understand that you opened your article to an audience both gay and Christian. But I respond to you only as a Christian. I am sorry if you were only looking for enthusiasm and support on this topic but I cannot.
You raise many questions, but the basic answer to all of them is that homosexuality is NOT a sin. The Bible is a collection of writings in several languages spanning more than 1,000 years. It was inspired by God but written by humans, so it does include contradictions. We also don’t know if Jesus was gay or not. It’s just a possibility. I recommend the following book for more details:
“What the Bible Really Says about Homosexuality” by Daniel Helminiak
Most Christians and non-believers seem to be unaware of a host of evidence pointing to Christ being gay (https://www.riaanbooysen.com/was-jesus-gay). The reason was that he was physically small, deformed and ugly, so no woman would ever look at him (see Wikipedia – the race and appearance of Christ).
How very beautiful the medal of Jesus kissing John is! When I made my First Holy Communion over sixty years ago, we boys wore a white carnation buttoniere with a white ribbon to which was fastened a round silver-like medal of John resting against Jesus at the Last Supper. Sadly, I lost it sometime during my high school years. Over the years, I have written meditative selections and poetry about the love of Jesus and John. Growing up gay “before Stonewall”, it was a comforting reality to recall in prayer.
Guy, thank you for sharing your beautiful thoughts and experience related to the medal of Jesus kissing John. I love imagining you as a youngster with your white carnation and medal of John resting his head on Jesus. The text accompanying the medal suggested that it would be “perfect for a first communion gift.”
Jesus would have been gay for a very important reason. Remember, the fallen angels in Genesis were cast out of Heaven for marrying and procreating with human women. Heavenly spirits are forbidden to procreate with humans. God wouldn’t deny the gift of companionship and sex to His son, so of course, Jesus was gay. That makes it obvious then to see that John was Jesus’s partner.
Artworks are artists’s interpretations and aren’t absolute and therefore do not define history. However, I would like to thank you for showing everyone what history may might have been based on how one perceives it.
Thank you for so much love as I have also loved you from the deep within. We all are united One in Christ Jesus.
Here is my story. Courtesy the Jesus and Resting John Image I have put in my biography of “Holy Dreams”
https://ahsannabikhan.wordpress.com/christians-realizing-their-jewish-roots/holy-dreams/
This is my first time at this website, and I am enjoying it very much, having been a priest and a sometimes ikonographer in my past. I am sorry, however, to see that big black stars have replaced the reprehensible tradition of the fig leaf on Christopher Olwage’s paintings. It does the artwork no justice, but renders its being to pornographically titillating. St Bonaventure allegedly said that the soul’s desire for mystical union with God is rooted in the human sexual appetite. If sacred art has a place in cultivating that desire, ought it not to be fully visible? Otherwise, the fullness of the Incarnation is negated in a way that seems to make it shameful.
Welcome and thanks for raising a valid point. As publisher, I have to declare whether its content is suitable for general audience, based on external definitions that say male frontal nudity is adult content. If the content here is adult-only, the whole website will become much harder for people to find because it will be restricted on search engines, social media etc. So I choose to limit some nudity in order to reach more people with an LGBTQ-positive spiritual message.
I discussed this with artist Christopher Olwage before posting his work, and he suggested using the black stars rather than omitting or cropping some of his art.
Even with compromises such as the black stars, Q Spirit was just accused of promoting “gay porn” by a conservative Catholic site:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lgbt-ministry-at-new-york-parish-promotes-gay-porn
Their critique focused on my article “Saint Sebastian: History’s first gay icon?”
Right-wing attacks won’t stop me from sharing art that affirms LGBTQ people as part of God’s good creation!
Thanks very much for your thoroughly researched and engaging article, Kitt. Though I have studied the subject of the Beloved Disciple at some length myself, I was unaware of much of the artwork and of the later relationship of John with Prochorus, who went on to become a Bishop. Amazing!
Artwork does not define truth, or history for that matter!